Comparison of Bone Morphogenic Proteins’ and Platelet Rich Fibrins’ Effectiveness in Socket Preservation
Abdulhamid Alshami
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad Nabil Azmouz *
College of Dentistry, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Hasan Hasan
College of Dentistry, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed Mahmood Shaheen
College of Dentistry, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Mohammed Al Naji
College of Dentistry, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Samira M. Osailan
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khames T. Alzahrani
BDS, PGD in Endo, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Jafar Alhaddad
Prosthodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, King Abdul-Aziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rayyan A. Kayal
Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Osama Ahmed Qutub
Prosthodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, King Abdul-Aziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The dentist faces a difficult challenge in preserving the quantity and quality of gum and bone tissues. Furthermore, the processes adopted should meet these objectives while posing no substantial future issues. In current dental and maxillofacial surgery, a variety of materials as Morphogenic Protein of Bone (BMP) and Platelet Rich Fibrins (PRF) are employed to repair and reconstruct bone tissue. The purpose of this review was to compare the efficiency of both BMP’s and PRF’s in Socket preservation. Reviewing the literature was conducted by using the following search strategies: Bone Morphogenic Proteins, Platelet Rich Fibrins, socket preservation approach, comparison of BMPs and PRFs, Bone Morphogenic Proteins and effectiveness in socket preservation and Platelet Rich Fibrins’ effectiveness in socket preservation. In conclusion, BMPs have been studied more completely than PRFs, and they have higher impacts on hard tissue regeneration and repair, according to the research. The fact that PRFs increase soft tissue healing shows how promising they are. Especially when we consider that soft tissue healing is more important than socket care in implant dentistry.
Keywords: Bone morphogenic proteins, platelet rich fibrins, socket preservation, dental biomaterial, dental implant