Prognosis and Management of Communicating and Non-communicating Hydrocele

Wedyan Salem Basaif *

Department of Urology, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah Khalid Murshid

College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.

Yazeed Mohammed Alhadi

Department of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Sultan Dhafer Albarman

Department of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed Jamal Almunaikh

Department of Urology, Farawaniya Hospital, Al Farawaniyah, Kuwait.

Ahmed Mahammed Alsaffar

College of Medicine, Gdansk Medical University, Gdansk, Poland.

Ahmed Saleh Aljohani

College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz Amer Alshehri

Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Khalid Saleh Aloufi

College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz Ahmed Alnami

Department of General Surgery, Al Omran General Hospital, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah Ali Asiri

College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Ziyad Hassan Siyam

Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Hydrocele can be found as a collection of fluid within the testicular tunica vaginalis. According to the etiology and pathophysiology of the disease, it can be classified into primary and secondary. Furthermore, primary hydrocele might include the closed or non-communicating, the communicating type, the congenital and or neonatal type. Many management approaches have been proposed for both the communicating and non-communicating hydrocele with different post-operative and prognostic outcomes. In this literature review, we have discussed the current management approaches and prognosis of communicating and non-community hydrocele. Adequate diagnosis of the condition is the first step to achieve favorable management outcomes. Although the reported management outcomes are reported to be effective in the literature, the surgical approaches seem to be superior. However, many side effects might be associated with these operations. Estimates show that following varicocelectomy procedures, ipselateral (left) hemi-scrotal varicocele is the most common condition to occur, which might even develop following the procedure by several months and years (in some cases). Further investigations are still needed because the current evidence is largely based on case reports and small case series investigations. Therefore, larger studies are needed to help draw effective management protocols and enhance the outcomes and prognosis.

Keywords: Hydrocele, communicating, non-communicating, management, prognosis


How to Cite

Basaif, W. S., Murshid, A. K., Alhadi, Y. M., Albarman, S. D., Almunaikh, M. J., Alsaffar, A. M., Aljohani, A. S., Alshehri, A. A., Aloufi, K. S., Alnami, A. A., Asiri, A. A. and Siyam, Z. H. (2021) “Prognosis and Management of Communicating and Non-communicating Hydrocele”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33(43B), pp. 347–353. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i43B32562.