Clinical Assessment: Short Term Retention of Giomer and Compomer Restorations in Class  V Non-Carious Cervical Lesions

Abdul Qadir Khan Dall; Imdad Hussain Domki; Mahwish Memon; Batool Bibi; Munir Ahmed Banglani; Sarwat Batool

doi:10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i32B31743

Clinical Assessment: Short Term Retention of Giomer and Compomer Restorations in Class V Non-Carious Cervical Lesions

Full Article - PDF Review History

Published: 2021-06-21

DOI: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i32B31743

Page: 61-67

Issue: 2021 - Volume 33 [Issue 32B]

Abdul Qadir Khan Dall *

Department of Operative Dentistry, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro/Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.

Imdad Hussain Domki

Bibi Asifa Dental College, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan.

Mahwish Memon

Department of Operative Dentistry, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro/Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.

Batool Bibi

Bibi Asifa Dental College, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan.

Munir Ahmed Banglani

Department of Oral Biology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro/Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.

Sarwat Batool

Department of Physiology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro/Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the retention rate of giomer and compomer in Class V restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).

Materials and methods: In this experimental study patients with non-carious cervical lesions were divided in to two groups (Group A and B). In group A (n=60), restoration was done with Giomer type of material and in group B (n=60) Compomer type of material was used for filling by the same operator. Cvar & Ryge Criteria were used to evaluate the retention of both materials as: Alpha (restoration fully retained), Bravo (restoration partially retained) and Charlie (restoration completely missing) at follow-ups 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th, 5^th and 6^th months. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 17.

Results: Males were 72% and females were 28%. The Mean age was 30.62 ±3.89 ranges from 13–85 years. Charlie score was observed at 5th and 6th months. The comparison between Giomer and Compomer at follow-up of 1st, 2nd, 4rd, 4th, 5th and 6th showed no statistical difference.

Conclusion: Giomer and compomer both have same retention rate in clinical trials.

Keywords: Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCL), giomer, compomer, ryge criteria

How to Cite

Dall, A. Q. K., Domki, I. H., Memon, M., Bibi, B., Banglani, M. A. and Batool, S. (2021) “Clinical Assessment: Short Term Retention of Giomer and Compomer Restorations in Class V Non-Carious Cervical Lesions”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33(32B), pp. 61–67. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i32B31743.