Accuracy of Impression Material During COVID-19 after Sterilization- In vitro Study
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International,
Aims: The goal of this research is to assess the effect of steam autoclave sterilization due to the impact of Covid-19 on the accuracy of the elastomer impression materials.
Study Design: In vitro study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah; Saudi Arabia, between June 2021 and November 2021.
Methodology: The following materials were used in this study: fully dentate master cast, metal trays, elastomer impression material (addition silicon), type IV stone. Forte impressions made using the metal tray and elastomer impression materials. The impressions were separated equally into two groups: Control group (C.G), untreated impressions. Sterilized group (S.G): Impressions were sterilized by using the steam autoclave. To make stone castings for each group, they were poured with type IV stone. The traveling microscope was used to evaluate the impression material's dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction with and without autoclave sterilization.
Results: The cross-arch distance (X) of the master model was measured (41.29 mm), While the cross arch distance (X) in the control group (C.G) of the untreated impressions had a mean and standard deviation of 41.492 ± 0.150 mm. In the tested group (S.G) : the sterilized impression, we found the cross-arch distance (X) had a mean and standard deviation of 41.628 ± 0.223 mm. The master model's Anteroposterior distance (A-P) was measured (21.12 mm). For the control group (C.G) : we found the mean and standard deviation value reading of the A-P distance were 20.899 ± 0.79 mm. For (S.G) group: we found the mean and standard deviation reading of the A-P distance were 19.992± 0.482 mm.
Conclusion: Steam autoclave sterilization of the elastomer impression material should be considered carefully, especially when fabricating fixed partial dentures. If the impression material is to be used in making diagnostic castings, conventional steam autoclave sterilization of the elastomers impression material may be sufficient for patients.
- dimensional stability
- autoclave sterilization
- dental biomaterial
How to Cite
González-Olmo MJ, Ortega-Martínez AR, Delgado-Ramos B, Romero-Maroto M, Carrillo-Diaz M. Perceived vulnerability to Coronavirus infection: impact on dental practice. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34: e044.
Pruthi G, Parkash H, Bharathi P V, Jain R, Gupta A, Rai S. Comprehensive review of guidelines to practice prosthodontic and implant procedures during COVID-19 pandemic. J oral Biol craniofacial Res. 2020;10(4):768–75.
Vázquez-Rodríguez I, Estany-Gestal A, Seoane-Romero J, Mora MJ, Varela-Centelles P, Santana-Mora U. Quality of cross-infection control in dental laboratories. A critical systematic review. Int J Qual Heal care J Int Soc Qual Heal Care. 2018;30(7):496–507.
Shetty M, Thulasidas N, John N, Hegde C. Microbial Analysis and Determination of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Dental Laboratory Equipments and Laboratory Attire. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(4):607–12.
Choi Y-R, Kim K-N, Kim K-M. The disinfection of impression materials by using microwave irradiation and hydroge peroxide. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(4):981–7.
Jamshidy L, Mozaffari HR, Faraji P, Sharifi R. Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis. Int J Dent. 2016;2016.
Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61:779–96.
Manikyamba YJB, Raju AVR, Sajjan MCS, Bhupathi PA, Rao DB, Raju JV. An evaluation of antimicrobial potential of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material incorporated with chitosan. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(3):297.
Singh G, Srivsatava S, Shekhar A, Chaturvedi A, Bhatia LK, Gupta A. Ozone Applications In Dentistry: A Biological Therapy. Onlinegatha; 2020.
Mahajan DRT. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Aloevera Sodium Hypochlorite Glutaraldehyde Idophor and Phenol as Disinfectant on Irreversible Hydrocolloid; 2018.
Azevedo MJ, Correia I, Portela A, Sampaio-Maia B. A simple and effective method for addition silicone impression disinfection. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11(3):155–61.
Al Kheraif AA. Surface roughness of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials following chemical disinfection, autoclave and microwave sterilization. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(3):483–7.
Khan A, Ali Khan T. Dimensional Stability of Vinylsiloxanether Impression Material After Autoclave Sterilization – an In vitro Study. Pakistan Oral Dent J. 2015; 35(3).
Savabi O, Nejatidanesh F, Bagheri KP, Karimi L, Savabi G. Prevention of cross-contamination risk by disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials with ozonated water. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9.
AlZain S. Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(4):161–70.
Gerhardt DE, Sydiskis RJ. Impression materials and virus. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(5):51–4.
Chee WW, Donovan TE. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(5):728–32.
Wu AY-J, Donovan TE. A modified one-step putty-wash impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3):245–6.
Holtan JR, Olin PS, Rudney JD. Dimensional stability of a polyvinylsiloxane impression material following ethylene oxide and steam autoclave sterilization. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(4):519–25.
Al Shikh A, Milosevic A. Effectiveness of alcohol and aldehyde spray disinfectants on dental impressions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:25.
Olin PS, Holtan JR, Breitbach RS, Rudney JD. The effects of sterilization on addition silicone impressions in custom and stock metal trays. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(6): 625–30.
Surendra GP, Anjum A, Satish Babu CL, Shetty S. Evaluation of dimensional stability of autoclavable elastomeric impression material. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011;11(1):63–6.
Abstract View: 261 times
PDF Download: 61 times