Day to Day Use of Disinfectant Methods for Different Impression Materials among Dental Practitioners
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International,
Page 113-124
DOI:
10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i2030735
Abstract
One of the major problems which most dental professionals face is cross contamination and cross infection. During the fabrication of dental prosthesis, special care should be taken for every step, especially impressions as they are one of the main concern. This is because impressions are one of the most known to be the main source of infection for any potentially infectious material . To check the practice of disinfection level among the dental practitioners, a questionnaire containing 15 questions was prepared. This survey was carried between the month of June 2019 to March 2020 among the dental practitioners living in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. This survey was carried under an online platform where the participants responded to their answers. Based on their responses, the result was tabulated. We got a result of about 64% practitioners practicing protocol to disinfect impressions 65% use alginate to take impressions. 44% use 2% glutaraldehyde to disinfect impressions. 46% prefer spraying disinfectant over impression tray. Based on much research, it was reported that dental technicians were suffering from infections in hand restoratory systems, so on humanitarian basis we dentists can take better measures ourselves in avoiding cross contamination to fellow dental technicians by following proper and simple methods for disinfection of impressions before sending them to dental laboratories. To conclude awareness workshops, programs must be organised to create awareness among dentists to present cross infections.
Keywords:
- Disinfectant
- chemicals
- uv chamber
- impressions
- dental practitioners
How to Cite
Selvam, S. P., & Rakshagan, V. (2020). Day to Day Use of Disinfectant Methods for Different Impression Materials among Dental Practitioners. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 32(20), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i2030735
References
Connor C. Cross-contamination control in prosthodontic practice. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4(4):337–44.
Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices [Internet] Theriogenology. 2012;77:467–82.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.043
Chan ESY. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, et al., Current management practice for bladder cancer in Hong Kong: a hospital-based cross-sectional survey [Internet]. Hong Kong Medical Journal; 2014.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.12809/hkmj134064
Guidelines for infection control in the dental office and the commercial dental laboratory. Council on Dental Therapeutics. Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110(6):969–72.
Al-Jabrah O, Al-Shumailan Y, Al-Rashdan M. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(3):299–307.
Ahmad S, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Moles DR. Effect of immersion disinfection with Perform-ID on alginate, an alginate alternative, an addition-cured silicone and resultant type III gypsum casts. Br Dent J. 2007;202(1);36–7.
Johnson GH, Chellis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(4): 446–53.
Kess RS, Combe EC, Sparks BS. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(1):98–102.
Jagger DC, Al Jabra O, Harrison A, Vowles RW, McNally L. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12(4):154–60.
Rowe AH, Forrest JO. Dental impressions. The probability of contamination and a method of disinfection [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 1978;145:184–6.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804140
Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: A literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2(6):537–42.
Look JO, Clay DJ, Gong K, Messer HH. Preliminary results from disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(6):701–7.
Rios MP, Morgano SM, Stein RS, Rose L. Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(4):356–62.
Fluoride supplement dosage. British Dental Association, the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 1997;182:6–7.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809281
Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Different Bone Regeneration Materials: An Animal Study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(1):22–8.
Ashok V, Ganapathy D. A geometrical method to classify face forms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):232–5.
Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(6):496–502.
Jain AR. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Implant Prostheses in Fibula Free Flaps. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(3):171–6.
Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Dentistry. 2018;9(1):68–75.
Evaluation of Corrosive Behavior of Four Nickel–chromium Alloys in Artificial Saliva by Cyclic Polarization Test:An in vitro Study. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 8(6):477–82.
Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(2):272–8.
Jain AR. Prevalence of Partial Edentulousness and Treatment needs in Rural Population of South India. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(3):213–7.
Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019;28(3):289–95.
Gupta P, Ariga P, Deogade SC. Effect of Monopoly-coating Agent on the Surface Roughness of a Tissue Conditioner Subjected to Cleansing and Disinfection: A Contact Profilometric Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):122–6.
Varghese SS, Ramesh A, Veeraiyan DN. Blended Module-Based Teaching in Biostatistics and Research Methodology: A Retrospective Study with Postgraduate Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(4): 445–50.
Sharma A, Kolte R, Kolte A. Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour among dental students concerning infection control measures [Internet]. Journal of Indian Dental Association; 2019.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.33882/jida.13.25165
Almortadi N, Chadwick RG. Disinfection of dental impressions – compliance to accepted standards [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 2010;209:607–11.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.1134
Cho GC, Chee WWL. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(4): 354–8.
Aroni MET, Raphael Ferreira Desouza, Oliveria LP, Jabr C, Barros LAB, Pero AC, et al., Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions for the All on four concept [Internet]. Vol. 30, Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019:58–58.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.20_13509
Thouati A, Deveaux E, Iost A, Behin P. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(1): 8–14.
Vatansever F, Ferraresi C, de Sousa MVP, Yin R, Rineh A, Sharma SK, et al. Can biowarfare agents be defeated with light? [Internet]. Virulence. 2013;4:796–825.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.26475
Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices [Internet] Theriogenology. 2012;77:467–82.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.043
Chan ESY. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, et al., Current management practice for bladder cancer in Hong Kong: a hospital-based cross-sectional survey [Internet]. Hong Kong Medical Journal; 2014.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.12809/hkmj134064
Guidelines for infection control in the dental office and the commercial dental laboratory. Council on Dental Therapeutics. Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110(6):969–72.
Al-Jabrah O, Al-Shumailan Y, Al-Rashdan M. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(3):299–307.
Ahmad S, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Moles DR. Effect of immersion disinfection with Perform-ID on alginate, an alginate alternative, an addition-cured silicone and resultant type III gypsum casts. Br Dent J. 2007;202(1);36–7.
Johnson GH, Chellis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(4): 446–53.
Kess RS, Combe EC, Sparks BS. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(1):98–102.
Jagger DC, Al Jabra O, Harrison A, Vowles RW, McNally L. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12(4):154–60.
Rowe AH, Forrest JO. Dental impressions. The probability of contamination and a method of disinfection [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 1978;145:184–6.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804140
Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: A literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2(6):537–42.
Look JO, Clay DJ, Gong K, Messer HH. Preliminary results from disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(6):701–7.
Rios MP, Morgano SM, Stein RS, Rose L. Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(4):356–62.
Fluoride supplement dosage. British Dental Association, the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 1997;182:6–7.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809281
Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Different Bone Regeneration Materials: An Animal Study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(1):22–8.
Ashok V, Ganapathy D. A geometrical method to classify face forms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):232–5.
Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(6):496–502.
Jain AR. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Implant Prostheses in Fibula Free Flaps. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(3):171–6.
Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Dentistry. 2018;9(1):68–75.
Evaluation of Corrosive Behavior of Four Nickel–chromium Alloys in Artificial Saliva by Cyclic Polarization Test:An in vitro Study. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 8(6):477–82.
Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(2):272–8.
Jain AR. Prevalence of Partial Edentulousness and Treatment needs in Rural Population of South India. World Journal of Dentistry. 2017;8(3):213–7.
Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019;28(3):289–95.
Gupta P, Ariga P, Deogade SC. Effect of Monopoly-coating Agent on the Surface Roughness of a Tissue Conditioner Subjected to Cleansing and Disinfection: A Contact Profilometric Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):122–6.
Varghese SS, Ramesh A, Veeraiyan DN. Blended Module-Based Teaching in Biostatistics and Research Methodology: A Retrospective Study with Postgraduate Dental Students. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(4): 445–50.
Sharma A, Kolte R, Kolte A. Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour among dental students concerning infection control measures [Internet]. Journal of Indian Dental Association; 2019.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.33882/jida.13.25165
Almortadi N, Chadwick RG. Disinfection of dental impressions – compliance to accepted standards [Internet]. British Dental Journal. 2010;209:607–11.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.1134
Cho GC, Chee WWL. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(4): 354–8.
Aroni MET, Raphael Ferreira Desouza, Oliveria LP, Jabr C, Barros LAB, Pero AC, et al., Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions for the All on four concept [Internet]. Vol. 30, Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019:58–58.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.20_13509
Thouati A, Deveaux E, Iost A, Behin P. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(1): 8–14.
Vatansever F, Ferraresi C, de Sousa MVP, Yin R, Rineh A, Sharma SK, et al. Can biowarfare agents be defeated with light? [Internet]. Virulence. 2013;4:796–825.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.26475
-
Abstract View: 299 times
PDF Download: 352 times
Download Statistics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
