The Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Use of Wire Stone Basket and Pneumatic Lithotripter Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Randomized Control Trial

Main Article Content

Moosa Asadi
Mohammad Nikpoor
Mohammad Reza Fattahi

Abstract

Introduction:  A routine treatment of ureteral stones is using ureteroscopic lithotripsy, a common problem of which is retropulsion of the stone to the renal pelvis and calyces that reduces the rate of lithotripsy’s success. In this study, we aim to investigate the safety and success of using wire basket to hold the stones along with pneumatic lithotripstic probe in endoscopic lithotripsy of ureteral stones.

Methods: Patients with ureteral stone were randomly divided to groups A and B. Group A (control) undergone lithotripsy without basket and group B (case) with wire basket along with pneumatic lithotripsy. In addition to demographic and clinical data, rate of success, retropulsion and residual stone with a size of greater than 3 mm were collected, before, during and after lithotripsy. Additionally, the total duration of lithotripsy and ureteral traumatic side effects was also recorded in both groups. All the patients were followed up until their discharge. Data was analyzed using SPPSS ve. 20. 

Results: There was no significant difference between groups by the point of demographic data. When compared together, there was no significant difference between the location, side and size of the stone and duration of the lithotripsy in both groups. The rate of lithotripsy success was significantly higher in the case group. The incidence of retropulsion and need for a secondary intervention was significantly higher in the control group.  We didn’t have any ureteral trauma in neither control nor case group.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, using wire basked as an anti retropulsion device increases the stone free rate in addition to it’s easy applicability, So it can be useful in treatment of ureteral stone.

Keywords:
Ureteral stone, stone retropulsion-ureteroscopic, lithotripsy- stone basket.

Article Details

How to Cite
Asadi, M., Nikpoor, M., & Reza Fattahi, M. (2019). The Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Use of Wire Stone Basket and Pneumatic Lithotripter Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 31(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2019/v31i630357
Section
Original Research Article

References

Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, Preminger GM, Tiselius HG. Contemporary management of ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):764-72.

Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. campbell-walsh urology. 10TH ed. surgical managment of upper urinary tract calculi. USA: Elsevier; 2012.

Ding H, Wang Z, Du W, Zhang H. NTrap in prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012;26(2):130-4.

Rane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, Shivde S, Elhilali M, Anidjar M, et al. The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: A randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1417-21.

Eisner BH, Dretler SP. Use of the stone cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy: Case series and review of the literature. Urol Inter. 2009;82(3):356-360.

Elashry OM, Tawfik AM. Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nature Revrol. 2012;9(12):691.

Desai MR, Patel SB, Desai MM, Kukreja R, Sabnis RB, Desai RM, et al. The dretler stone cone: A device to prevent ureteral stone migration—the initial clinical experience. J Urol. 2002;167(5):1985-8.

Robert M, Bennani A, Guiter J, Avérous M, Grasset D. Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the Lithoclast. Eur Urol. 1994; 26(3):212-5.

Menezes P, Kumar P, Timoney A. A randomized trial comparing lithoclast with an electrokinetic lithotripter in the management of ureteric stones. BJU Inter. 2000;85(1):22-25.

Knispel HH, Klän R, Heicappell R, Miller K. Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: Results in 143 patients. J Endourol. 1998;12(6):513-5.11.

Lee MJ, Lee ST, Min SK. Use of NTrap® during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51(10):719-723.

Delvecchio FC, Kuo RL, Preminger GM. Clinical efficacy of combined lithoclast and lithovac stone removal during ureteroscopy. J Urol. 2000;164(1):40-42.

Ursiny M, Eisner BH. Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsion devices for ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1762-6.

Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Randomized trial of NTrap for proximal ureteral stones. Urology. 2011;77(3):553-7.

Wu JA, Ngo TC, Hagedorn JC, Macleod LC, Chung BI, Shinghal R. The accordion antiretropulsive device improves stone-free rates during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):438-41.

Lee H, Ryan RT, Teichman JM, Kim J, Choi B, Arakeri NV, et al. Stone retropulsion during holmium: YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 2003;169(3):881-5.

Marguet CG, Sung JC, Springhart WP, L'Esperance JO, Zhou S, Zhong P, et al. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse nd: YAG laser and the holmium: YAG laser. J Urol. 2005;173(5): 1797-800.

Dretler SP. Ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi: prevention of stone migration. J Endourol. 2000;14(7):565-7.

Pagnani CJ, El Akkad M, Bagley DH. Prevention of stone migration with the Accordion during endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2012;26(5):484-8

Farahat YA, Elbahnasy AE, Elashry OM. A randomized prospective controlled study for assessment of different ureteral occlusion devices in prevention of stone migration during pneumatic lithotripsy. Urology. 2011;77(1):30-5.

Kroczak T, Ghiculete D, Sowerby R, Ordon M, Lee JY, Pace KT, et al. Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12(8):280–283.